Start here

Choose the fastest safe path from software bottleneck to shipped project.

ThynkQ is built for founders and operators who need a clear technical owner. Pick the route that matches your current pain, then book the fit call with the right context already attached.

If the next risk is specifically AI-tool or MCP rollout safety, use the specialist lane below instead of forcing it into a broad generic call.

$5KAudit before larger spend
$12K+Sprint for one blocked workflow
$25K+Build lane for launch work
Run the free lane calculatorBook a fit call now
PL Maps case study preview showing the live routing and provider-search surface.

Replaced brittle map deps, shipped routing from scratch

public case study + live product

Owned infra. Cleaner map. Week one in prod.

A routing and provider-search platform that replaced brittle map dependencies with owned infrastructure and a cleaner operating surface.

Live productCase studyArchitecture notes
terminal
open tool + paid review lane

Ship AI tools without guessing the blast radius.

Open-source MCP scanning plus a 48-hour human risk review for teams connecting sensitive tools, credentials, or AI workflows.

16 scanners17+ AI tool clientsRisk review
ThynkQ products page showing paid entry products and buyer routing.

Paid entry paths for diligence, AI integration, starter traction

paid products + founder route

Scope clarity before you spend on the full build.

Small paid paths for scope clarity, diligence, AI integration, and starter build traction before a bigger implementation.

Paid productsStarter kitsFounder fit

Specialized paid lane

Do not force AI or MCP rollout risk into a generic route.

The fastest paid decision path on the board is already live. Use the founder-led MCP Risk Review when one bad configuration could leak secrets, over-expand permissions, or create avoidable rollout damage.

$3K fixed scope48 hours turnaround17+ AI tool clients
Reserve MCP Risk ReviewRun MCP calculatorOpen mcp-scan proof
01Use this when AI tools, MCP servers, permissions, or secrets are close to a real rollout.
02Do not force a narrow MCP risk decision into a generic discovery call or a broad architecture lane.
03If the risk is broader than MCP, escalate into Technical Audit after the specialist review.

Pick by current pain

Pick the route that matches the next real decision.

One urgent workflow is blocked

Sprint Fix

2 weeks · from $12K

Best when one integration, dashboard, payment flow, AI workflow, or internal process needs to ship fast.

Inspect now

Use the products shelf to see how blocked-workflow buyers enter ThynkQ before a bigger build.

Inspect paid starter products
Open Sprint Fix

A product needs to launch this quarter

Product Build

2-8 weeks · $25K-$50K

Best when the core workflow is known and you need one accountable owner from scope to production handoff.

Inspect now

Inspect live work and current launches before you commit to the build lane.

See flagship work
Open Product Build

Technical decisions keep repeating

Fractional CTO

$10K-$15K/mo

Best when the team needs ongoing architecture, hiring, vendor, roadmap, and code-quality leadership.

Inspect now

Review the founder-led operating model and core pod support before choosing recurring technical leadership.

See founder-led delivery
Open Fractional CTO

If you are not ready to book

Use the softer paths first.

Free tools help you self-qualify before you book or buy.

Not sure which lane fits?

Run the free calculator and get a lane recommendation before the call.

Run calculator

AI or MCP workflow risk?

Run the MCP calculator if the next decision is about AI-tool permissions, rollout risk, or a fast specialist review.

Run MCP calculator

Need founder background first?

See Rodolf, the core pod, and the founder-led delivery model before booking.

Open about

Budget not ready yet?

Start with ThynkQ products and frameworks before a larger engagement.

Browse products

Fit call prep

Bring three things and the call gets useful fast.

This makes the call practical instead of generic. If the project is not a fit, you still leave with a direct recommendation.

  • One screenshot of the broken or missing workflow
  • One deadline or business reason this matters now
  • One decision owner who can approve scope and budget

Want the shortest path?

If one workflow is blocked, start with Sprint Fix. If the build is broader, start with Product Build. If you are unsure, use the calculator.

I have one blocked workflowI need a product built