Full education platform release with auth, billing, AI workflows, and launch handoff.
Choose the right delivery lane, then ship with proof.
You are not buying vague engineering hours. You are buying a defined execution lane, weekly proof checkpoints, and a production-safe handoff.
Operator-led by Abanoub Rodolf Boctor (Rodolf). Product Build is the default middle tier for near-term launches. Short-term plans are available too, Sprint Fix (2 weeks) and Launch Sprint (4 weeks), when one workflow is blocked before full build scope.
Use this page for lane fit and delivery model. Use Pricing for exact cost ranges and package depth.
Book Product Build fit callGet lane recommendation in one callSee exact pricing and short-term plans
Want founder background first? Learn more about Rodolf · Speaking profile.
Proof snapshots
138,236 lines by day 6, 153K by day 21
Education platform release with billing, auth, and AI workflows.
Rodolf owned architecture, implementation, QA, and launch handoff.
Read case context700K+ monthly AI interactions
Operational AI automation rollout across high-volume user traffic.
Rodolf designed routing, guardrails, and production reliability controls.
Read case context72% to 96.2% compliance accuracy
Enterprise model quality recovery with measurable weekly checkpoints.
Rodolf led technical direction, experimentation, and deployment proof.
Read case contextStart here in 20 seconds
Three core service lanes. Product Build is the middle lane and the most common fit for near-term launches. Short-term plans are available lower on this page when only one workflow is blocked.
Technical Audit1 week · $5K · clarity before build spendProduct Build2-8 weeks · $25K-$50K · default middle tierMost selectedFractional CTOmonth to month · $10K-$15K/mo · recurring leadership
Need a short-term sprint first? Jump to Sprint Fix and Launch Sprint details.
Delivery default middle tier
If your core workflow is defined and launch is this quarter, Product Build is the right starting lane.
Technical Audit reduces risk before build spend. Fractional CTO keeps monthly execution quality high after or between launches.
What each lane includes in practice
Use this to quickly map your current situation to the right depth, without guessing.
Technical Audit
Best when: Use when priorities are fuzzy and wrong build decisions are expensive.
Depth: 1-week diagnostic with architecture, security, performance, and conversion clarity.
You walk away with: You leave with a ranked implementation sequence before spending larger build budget.
Product Build
Best when: Default middle tier when launch is this quarter and scope is mostly known.
Depth: 2-8 week execution ownership across design direction, implementation, QA, deploy, and handoff.
You walk away with: You leave with production software, clear operating docs, and post-launch support.
Fractional CTO
Best when: Use when a team ships monthly and needs recurring senior technical leadership.
Depth: Month-to-month architecture, hiring, roadmap, and quality guidance with weekly cadence.
You walk away with: You get stronger technical decisions and consistent execution rhythm without full-time CTO cost.
60-second core lane chooser
Need one urgent blocker resolved first? Use a short-term sprint, then transition to Product Build if scope expands.
Product Build depth bands
Same core lane, different depth. Most teams launching this quarter start in the Growth build pattern.
See exact pricing ranges by tierStarter build
Launch one production workflow with auth, billing, and analytics in place.
You need one revenue-critical workflow live fast, with no scope sprawl.
- Single primary workflow from onboarding to value
- Production auth, payments, and analytics instrumentation
- Launch docs and deployment handoff
Typical timeline: 2-4 weeks
Growth build
Ship broader workflows with stronger admin tooling and deeper AI automation coverage.
Most teams launching this quarter with 2-3 connected workflows and real operator needs.
- Everything in Starter build
- Multiple connected workflows and richer state handling
- Admin operations dashboard and stronger quality controls
Typical timeline: 4-6 weeks
Most common starting engagement for near-term launch teams.Multi-surface launch
Release multiple product surfaces with advanced integrations and hardened launch operations.
You need multi-surface shipping with higher operational complexity and deeper integrations.
- Everything in Growth build
- Multiple product surfaces and deeper integration depth
- Launch hardening across observability, failure handling, and handoff
Typical timeline: 6-8 weeks
Core service lanes
Technical Audit
1 week
When the product feels risky or unclear and you need a clear fix order before spending more build budget.
Outcome focus
De-risk the next 90 days so you avoid expensive wrong builds and know exactly what should ship first.
Choose this when scope or architecture is still unclear.
Not ideal for: Not ideal if your scope is already defined and you need implementation to start now.
What you get
- Architecture and codebase audit
- Security and performance risk mapping
- Conversion and UX friction review
- Prioritized execution plan with risk order
- Clear build/no-build decision guidance for founders
Typical timeline: 1 week
Product Build
2-8 weeks
Best fit for near-term launch teams that need full implementation ownership.
When you need production software shipped this quarter with full implementation ownership.
If you need to ship this quarter, this is usually the right starting lane.
Outcome focus
Launch a production product that can onboard users, capture revenue, and be handed off cleanly.
Choose this when scope is mostly known and you need a production launch this quarter.
Not ideal for: Not ideal if you only need one urgent workflow fixed in isolation.
What you get
- Design direction and implementation
- State and edge-case coverage
- Production-ready deployment path
- Launch support, proof artifacts, and handoff docs
- Clear depth bands from starter build to full multi-surface launch
Typical timeline: 2-8 weeks
Fractional CTO
per month
When founders or ops teams need senior technical leadership month to month without a full-time executive.
Outcome focus
Improve monthly shipping velocity, hiring quality, and technical decision confidence without a full-time CTO hire.
Choose this when your team ships monthly and needs senior technical leadership.
Not ideal for: Not ideal if you need a one-time project build with a defined launch date.
What you get
- Architecture decisions and execution oversight
- Hiring and vendor evaluation support
- Technical roadmap and risk management
- Senior technical communication for stakeholders
- Leadership continuity while the team scales month to month
Typical timeline: month to month
Short-term sprints (optional pre-build)
Use these only when one critical workflow is blocked. If more than one workflow is in scope, start with Product Build.
Sprint Fix starts at $12K for 2 weeks. Launch Sprint starts at $18K for 4 weeks.
- Not for multi-surface builds.
- Not for net-new platforms.
- Graduation path: sprint first, Product Build next.
Use only when scope is one workflow, one owner, and one release. Otherwise start Product Build.
How every engagement runs
The delivery posture stays consistent whether the engagement starts as an audit, a build, or an ongoing leadership lane.
1) Scope lock
Define outcome, timeline, risk boundaries, and decision owners before implementation starts.
2) Weekly proof
Every week includes shipped changes, acceptance checkpoints, and explicit next decisions.
3) Production handoff
Launch with deployment confidence, documentation, and a clear post-launch support path.
- Direct operator execution from scope to handoff
- Weekly proof updates with decision checkpoints
- Clear scope control before implementation starts
- Production-safe delivery and launch readiness checks
Work directly with Rodolf
You work directly with Rodolf from scope lock through launch. No handoff chain, weekly proof of progress, and documented ownership per milestone.