Skip to main content

Buyer due diligence

A clear record before a larger commitment.

This is the public record of how we approach delivery, proof, and handoff. It names what you can inspect now and what the scoping reply should confirm for your specific risk, scope, and procurement path.

We reply within two business days with a fit decision and a clear next step.

The sample partner statement of work: a white-label Rescue Sprint with fee, duration, agency and end-client fields, and the first numbered sections.The sample partner statement of work: a white-label Rescue Sprint with fee, duration, agency and end-client fields, and the first numbered sections.
A sample scoped document. Open the full sample.

Execution record

Technical ownership stays connected to delivery.

We keep scope, technical judgment, and client communication close to the work. The engagement record is designed to make decisions, progress, and the next owner legible throughout delivery.

  1. Scope before build

    The proposed outcome, boundary, decision owner, and acceptance evidence are made explicit before implementation begins.

  2. Visible execution

    Work is reviewed against the shipped change and the next decision, not reported through a detached status layer.

  3. Operating handoff

    Source, architecture context, operating notes, and the next owner are part of the delivery record.

Inspectable delivery controls

Shipped, in public

Buyer-facing interpretation of the public mcp-scan commit log below - controls visible in those changes, not a claimed commercial outcome the repository cannot prove.

  1. Failure paths

    Requests already in flight get an answer when the server closes, pinned by unit tests.

  2. Reliable tests

    Tests wait on signals instead of sleeps and share one deadline, so machine load stops failing them.

  3. Watch mode

    Watch mode survives unexpected errors and reports a dead watcher instead of going quiet.

8 public changes, 10 October 2026. Log captured 2026-10-10. The repo keeps moving, so newer commits may sit above these:

CommitChange
4e1d6c2kill a hung proxy before the burst test times out
810379epin failed-write replies with a unit test
9ba6eebbind each write to its request ids so callback order can't misreply
a94fc26proxy answers requests already in flight when the server closes stdin
39cd3b7proxy test awaits its processes on a failed wait and shares one deadline
078c165proxy lifecycle test waits on signals, not sleeps, so load can't flake it
83cf423make the mid-scan loop test exercise the guard, cover non-Error and dead watcher
03aab20watch: survive non-Error throws, surface dead watchers in the footer
mcp-scan commit log, public repo

The delivery lead stays on the build through the production handoff. The full studio roster is public. See the studio

What delivery can include

Artifacts are tied to the lane, not hidden behind a sales process.

Exact inclusions are set in the scoped engagement. These are documented artifacts from the public delivery catalog.

  • Scoped outcome and acceptance criteria
  • QA proof and responsive checks where UI is involved
  • Deployment or launch-readiness notes
  • Written scope with acceptance criteria by milestone
  • Production deployment checklist and launch report
  • Handoff docs covering architecture, operations, and support path
Inspect engagement scope and pricing

Public evidence

What can be inspected now.

Public evidence has a source and a stated verification boundary. Confidential work remains described at the level that can be responsibly published.

Live in production

PL Maps: replaced a paid MapQuest dependency with map infrastructure PowerLiens owns, shipped in 4 weeks

Public case study and an interface demo on invented records. The production system is behind the client's login. Built for PowerLiens; PowerLiens owns the system, its data, and its roadmap.

PowerLiens case study

Public product surface live

ProTeach: a homeschool platform our founder co-founded and built, predating ThynkQ, not a client engagement

The public marketing surface and privacy-screened captures are reviewable. Repository evidence is summarized because the source is private.

Public ProTeach surface

NDA-protected

One NDA-safe healthcare AI engagement: intake, scheduling, and operations

The public description is intentionally limited. It does not claim a client identity, outcome numbers, or independent verification.

Work index

Public

Technical writing depth: production playbooks, architecture decisions, AI integration guides

Multiple long-form pieces show implementation detail, tradeoff analysis, and production pitfalls.

Writing index

Public

Open source security tooling for MCP infrastructure

The public repository and package can be inspected directly for technical review.

mcp-scan source

Public

Founder engineering footprint: profiles, open source, and public delivery record

The profile states the founder's execution lanes and links directly to LinkedIn, GitLab, and the mcp-scan npm package. Commit history and post dates remain visible at those sources.

Founder profile

Scoping boundary

What we confirm privately, before you commit.

A public website cannot answer every procurement question truthfully. The scoping reply is where the proposed work is made specific without publishing client-sensitive details or generic assurances.

Scope and acceptance

The proposed boundary, milestones, exclusions, and evidence that would show the work is ready.

Execution ownership

Who owns the technical decisions, the direct communication path, and the review cadence for the proposed engagement.

Security and procurement fit

Which security, access, confidentiality, and commercial questions are relevant to the proposed scope.

Partner and dependency fit

Whether the proposed scope needs specialist capacity or third-party dependencies beyond the work described publicly.

Next decision

Bring the constraint. We will make the responsible next step clear.

Share what is blocked, what is already true, and what needs to be safe when it ships.